Congress waits for corps report
Recipe for trouble:
Start with endangered salmon.
Combine with a heap of cheap electricity and a dash of threatened
transportation subsidies.
Add a generous dose of federal agencies, environmental groups and
farm advocates. And do all this during federal election season.
Now mix in $20 million in paperwork but reserve several billion dollars
for later.
Let simmer. (Serves the nation)
In December, the Corps of Engineers plans to release its contribution
to the Northwest fish recipe: a long-awaited - and months-overdue - $20
million report to Congress about whether to tear down the four Lower Snake
River dams to help endangered salmon and steelhead.
Of course, it's impossible to say with 100 percent certainty what would
happen if the dams go down - an unseen combination of events could buoy
or sink the regional economy.
But corps studies indicate the result would be more of a shift in jobs
rather than a huge net loss. Ten years after the dams go, according to the
corps' "most likely" scenario, the Northwest would be down about
1,300 jobs - almost entirely in Franklin, Walla Walla and the other counties
along the Snake reservoirs.
In the short term, the corps predicts 13,000 temporary new jobs to do
tasks such as tear down the dams, build roads and modify wells.
Still, razing the dams would have a physical and psychological effect
on the Mid-Columbia unlike anything since plutonium production stopped at
Hanford in the late 1980s.
The corps study will include approximately 3,000 pages - roughly the
same amount of ink that lobbying groups on both sides of the issue have
spilled putting out their spin since the discussion became a regional controversy.
Over the last several months, the corps has released pieces of its draft
report on the Internet at www.nww.usace.army.mil/html/offices/pl/er/studies/lsrpublic/lsrmain.htm
"They are attempts to provide rough approximations as to what kind
of impacts we would expect to see," said Dennis Wagner, one of the
study managers in Portland.
Many find fault with the corps numbers, with river users saying they
don't accurately reflect the costs and environmentalists saying they don't
show enough of the benefits.
However accurate the corps' vision proves to be, it is important for
one simple reason - Congress will use the revised document to determine
what to do with the dams. With congressional approval, nearly four decades
of life built around those huge dams could come crashing down.
Before that would happen, however, Northwest residents will get to weigh
in at a series of public hearings planned this winter. Dates have not been
announced.
As of Friday, it was still not made public if the corps will recommend
the best way to revive salmon runs. Besides breaching, it could promote
its current operations or suggest a variety of technical attempts to upgrade
the hydrosystem - two options that are largely lost in the rhetoric about
breaching.
"I strongly suspect (federal agencies) will kick that can down the
road and leave that controversial issue to be decided by the next president,"
said Sen. Slade Gorton, R-Wash.
But the region wants to see a proposal - and there is some indication
the sides are getting closer to the point where they can talk civilly about
what kind of economic assistance package it would take to ease the impact
of a "natural" river.
American Rivers, a national environmental group, recently released a
report about how to fix the transportation system to accommodate life without
barges - its attempt to get Congress to look at costs beyond saving fish.
"If this is going to happen, how can we do it in a way that doesn't
throw it on the backs of farmers?" asked Rob Masonis, with American
Rivers.
While river users object to American Rivers' estimates, at least some
of them appreciate the sentiment.
"It's not about numbers. It's got to be about having the conversation,"
said Frank Carroll, spokesman for the Potlach timber company in Lewiston,
which stands to lose millions of dollars if the dams are breached. "If
they are not trying to kill us, maybe we can talk." |